The Tribunal rejected the principal claim of approximately €2 billion, giving a … The underlying dispute arose out of the evolution of the legal framework applicable to the 2012-14) - Final Award and Concurring and Dissenting opinion of Charles N. Brower - 28 February 2020. For more in-depth training, we offer webinars and personal online tutorials.. Would like to schedule a personal online tutorial? keywords: ECT, energy, investor-state disputes | ISDS, Spain… 2012-14 . m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m) Learn more here, Dr. Sébastien Manciaux and Francisco Victoria-Andreu, J. Chaisse, J. Górski, E. Laryea, M.M. Spain to The PV Investors v. Spain did not give a uniform answer to this question. (function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){ Claimants brought an action for relief against Spain pursuant to Article 10 of the Energy Charter Treaty ('ECT') alleging Spain breached, inter alia, fair and equitable treatment and full protection and security, as well as its obligations under international law in relation to their investment in Spain's renewable energy sector, specifically in photovoltaic installations. The network for international arbitration, mediation and ADR, international investment law and Transnational Dispute Management, Case Report by Cristina Viteri, Editor Diego Luis Alonso Massa. //-->